Elizabeth Keogh ([info]sirenian) wrote,

Curious...

If an Agile Evangelist falls in the forest and there's no one to hear him, does he still go on, and on, and on about it?

(Not thinking of anyone in particular, unless it's me.)

  • Post a new comment

    Error

  • 8 comments

Anonymous

October 12 2005, 22:18:23 UTC 6 years ago

Thanks for the laugh - that's hilarious!
And a reminder not to take ourselves too seriously.
Nordin.

Anonymous

October 13 2005, 11:35:47 UTC 6 years ago

or her even..

[info]sirenian

October 13 2005, 13:59:30 UTC 6 years ago

I feel comfortable with the use of "him" as a gender-inspecific pronoun, and suspect that I covered the alternative with my closing tag.

But I did think about it.

Anonymous

October 27 2005, 00:33:05 UTC 6 years ago

Easy - just change 'him' to 'them' - works just as well.
Nordin.
(I'm still chuckling over this line....)

[info]sirenian

November 1 2005, 16:47:06 UTC 6 years ago

Glad you liked it.

To me, the use of "he" and "him" produces an actual image which is somewhat vague when I use "them". "Them" are little grey aliens with big eyes and no real features.

If I wasn't female, and guilty of this kind of behaviour myself, I'd have used "them". But luckily I don't have to in order to retail my PC cred, so I didn't. :)

Anonymous

November 15 2005, 17:55:21 UTC 6 years ago

grammar cred

If I weren't female, ... :-)

Anonymous

November 16 2005, 14:11:17 UTC 6 years ago

Singular versus Plural

No, "them" is a plural pronoun and "an Agile Evangelist" is singular so a singular pronoun such as "him" (or "her") is correct. If the language used to express this happy little thought contained a gender-neutral pronoun, I'm sure Elizabeth would have used it.

Anonymous

January 8 2007, 07:52:05 UTC 5 years ago

Gender-neutral pronoun alternatives...

it? he/she? he and/or she? biznatch?
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…